Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '17 at 00:12
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$899
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 900
80% 677 Pts
64-Core 2,658
164% 2,658 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 388.59
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 176
Parallax 184
129% 173 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 183
Splatting 137
121% 149 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 121%
Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
954GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,243
Write 1,779
Mixed 1,788
431% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 54.9
215% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 478
DQ Mixed 224
245% 412 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 286%
Great: 363%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 1,700
Mixed 1,713
396% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 44.9
205% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 9.24
116% 271 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 259%
Great: 363%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
814GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 512
Write 413
Mixed 429
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 27.3
126% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 136
108% 142 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 137%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
678GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 411
Mixed 420
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 43.1
149% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 38.2
61% 109 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
632GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 407
Mixed 413
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 38.5
144% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 125
141% 241 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$249
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 208
Mixed 184
151% 201 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.96
4K Mixed 0.64
164% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 142
Write 134
Mixed 135
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.89
4K Mixed 0.34
129% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 155
Mixed 140
120% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.28
107% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93% Outstanding
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 32.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $899
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback