Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault X99H
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '23 at 21:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 748
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 1,206
75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 18.4
15% 18.1 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.7
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aoluska A6-500G 500GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS2422P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 177 194 210 126 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.6% Average
Read 154
Write 192
Mixed 190
SusWrite 171
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 10.9
72% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 16
51% 112 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
252GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 76.8
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 89.6
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U22T3 2x8GB
2 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.7% Above average
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 TXD0000 HDMI
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback