Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 149
54% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 224
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 4
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 120 153 61 79 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 435
Write 279
Mixed 326
SusWrite 127
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 29.4
108% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 190
160% 233 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 92%
WD WD7500AYYS-01RCA0 750GB
408GB free
Firmware: 30.04G30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.7
Write 32.1
Mixed 39.5
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0420 DDR3 1866 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 9% 22 75 58 60 0" 1366 768 Default
Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback