Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive408% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU603ZW
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 15:14
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 295
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 756
70% 585 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1A8C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3962
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 144
Parallax 25.5
16% 63.1 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 19.4
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3393 3606 2076 1201 1214 1207 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 3,490
Write 3,682
Mixed 2,517
SusWrite 2,116
663% 2,951 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 84.7
307% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 1,021
762% 1,012 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 408%
Great: 540%
Wilk USB DISK 2.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.5
12% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 32GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 43.1
124% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 21.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 4R 0G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 16% 77 557 467 165 16" 1707 996 BOE0A0B
History: Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B | Score 28: 0P 4R 0G 8B
Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW Builds (Compare 2,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603ZW_GU603ZW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback