Acer Aspire A515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Doc_WC
Memory15.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 21:52
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 104
57% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 137
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1345) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.9
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 1.7
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 292 290 314 323 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 160
Write 64.9
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 301
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 7.9
30% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 13.1
10% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16S4/16G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 14% 22 23 3 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15E7
Typical Aspire A515-54 Builds (Compare 1,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback