Supermicro C7Q67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro C7Q67  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Q67
Memory20.6 GB free of 32.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130628
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 22:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 177
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 423
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 99.5
58% 79.7 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 82.1
Splatting 52.5
54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 144 170 177 100 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 255
Write 233
Mixed 217
SusWrite 136
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 29
106% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 39.6
63% 123 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
174GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 130 128 124 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 151
Write 135
Mixed 26
SusWrite 128
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. MXIC 25L Series 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 60 72.3" 1536 864 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical C7Q67 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7Q67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback