Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '14 at 19:35
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.55 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 151
52% 114 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 530
49% 407 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7970-$435
XFX(1682 3211) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.9% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 56.7
36% 44.2 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 39.6
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 1,017
Write 391
Mixed 505
140% 638 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 18.7
131% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 19.1
30% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1TB
734GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 178
Write 24.9
Mixed 44.1
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.84
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 1.18
245% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 140%
ST375052 8AS 750GB
479GB free, PID 202a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 29.8
Mixed 15.7
31% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.28
49% 0.62 MB/s
WD My Book 1140 2TB
183GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 54.3
Write 81.5
Mixed 40.3
77% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.14
60% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 49%
WDC WD32 00AAKS-00SBA0 320GB
5GB free, PID 202a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 29.1
Mixed 17.2
31% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.9 MB/s
Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback