Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 09:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 170
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 743
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 188
Parallax 177
137% 178 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 178
Splatting 124
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 256G 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0513A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 286 178 314 179 236 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,620
Write 1,398
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 287
245% 1,099 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 25.6
127% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 430
DQ Write 428
DQ Mixed 416
316% 425 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 139%
Great: 215%
Walram 1TB 1TB
434GB free
Firmware: 301B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 206 41 8.4 156 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 422
Write 219
Mixed 285
SusWrite 115
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 11.9
93% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 15.9
83% 187 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 14 60 27" 1920 1080 PHLC208 PHL 271E1
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback