HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '23 at 15:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 179
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 484
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 0.3
46% 45.9 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 46.9
39% 47 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ3A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 6.1 5.3 340 402 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 359
Write 364
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 213
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 11.4
57% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 17.9
15% 21.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
78GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 61 67 65 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 53.2
Write 72.4
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 63.8
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.3
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.8
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback