Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory34.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '23 at 20:11
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 642
66% 533 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Sapphire(1DA2 E439) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 165
Parallax 351
139% 229 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 180
Splatting 241
196% 240 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 881 898 908 914 906 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 868
Write 2,099
Mixed 670
SusWrite 933
260% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 99
4K Mixed 46.7
163% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 764
576% 777 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 177%
Great: 492%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 148 149 148 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 153
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 148
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91%
Great: 100%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 117 116 118 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67% Good
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 192 198 195 184 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 120
Write 130
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 191
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.9
262% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 113%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
680GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 99 96 101 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 94.4
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 99.1
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 130 131 129 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 84.9
Write 132
Mixed 114
SusWrite 132
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
279% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 97%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
102GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 38 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 38.5
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 39
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
80% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 84.6" 2560 1440 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical AB350M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback