MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 03:56
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 161
2-Core 332
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 868
97% 760 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Gigabyte(1458 240B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 181
Parallax 268
123% 200 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 188
Splatting 219
168% 203 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SOLIDIGM SSDPFKN 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2898 2967 3050 3051 3044 2899 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,293
Write 3,042
Mixed 2003
SusWrite 2,985
584% 2,581 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 99.8
348% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,045
801% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 431%
Great: 431%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
303GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 112
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWR440 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0601
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 219 221 218 220 218 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 203
Mixed 127
SusWrite 219
139% 189 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 122%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TAC4U3200E18162C 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 28.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 AOP091C 27HC5R V
Typical B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback