Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-N305 282 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 35.1 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 147 43% 82.5 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 607 56% 471 Pts	64-Core 622 38% 622 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 622 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3B3C) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3677 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	6.22% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 8.9 Parallax 7.5 6% 7.73 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 9.8 Splatting 8.2 8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.22% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L1QHXC7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 436 483 412 438 450 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 801 Write 495 Mixed 536 SusWrite 444 127% 569 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 19 72% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 81.2 DQ Mixed 206 155% 216 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 227%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 4x2GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.6% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 226 18% 226 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	15.5"	1536 864	LEN9051

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples	15x
Core i3-N305IntelBench 59%, 282 samples	9x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	15x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 6%, 622 samples	9x

SSD
MZALQ128HCHQ-00BL2 128GBSamsungBench 132%, 67 samples	10x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GBSamsungBench 146%, 356 samples	5x
CL1-4D128 128GBSsstcBench 83%, 486 samples	4x

RAM
MT62F1G32D4DR-031 4x2GBMicronBench 68%, 149 samples	10x
H9JCNNNBK3MLYR-N6E 4x1GBHynixBench 55%, 25 samples	8x
K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 4x2GBSamsungBench 63%, 14 samples	5x