Metabox Prime-XR X370SNV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive441% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMetabox Prime-XR X370SNV  (all builds)
MotherboardIT X370SNx
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '23 at 11:11
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U29, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 216
2-Core 424
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1,416
135% 1,116 Pts
64-Core 3,227
200% 3,227 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 3702) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3699
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 127
Parallax 130
100% 127 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 132
Splatting 133
111% 136 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 103%
Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1879 1866 1913 1937 1958 2010 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
441% Outstanding
Read 3,248
Write 1,820
Mixed 2,007
SusWrite 1927
502% 2,250 MB/s
4K Read 79.1
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 117
404% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,661
DQ Write 1,406
DQ Mixed 1,553
1,158% 1,540 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 441%
Great: 587%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4638 4648 4654 4665 4516 1707 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
525% Outstanding
Read 3,068
Write 4,351
Mixed 3456
SusWrite 4,138
852% 3,753 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 88.7
284% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,513
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,636
1,155% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 525%
Great: 587%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4324 4333 4337 4323 4328 2564 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
488% Outstanding
Read 2,906
Write 4,052
Mixed 3,195
SusWrite 4,035
805% 3,547 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 62.7
204% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,516
DQ Write 1,274
DQ Mixed 1,412
1,053% 1,401 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 488%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905789-040.A00G 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 55.3
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 29.6
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 17.2" 2560 1440 BOE0BB7
Typical Prime-XR X370SNV Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 212%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 256%
UFO

System: Metabox Prime-XR X370SNV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 190% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback