Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '23 at 17:17
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10850H 6,246 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 136 2-Core 248 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 785 77% 632 Pts	64-Core 939 58% 939 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design 351 User benchmarks, average bench 87% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 529.08 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.2% Outstanding	Lighting 108 Reflection 125 Parallax 118 88% 117 fps	MRender 151 Gravity 104 Splatting 107 97% 121 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 512GB 495 User benchmarks, average bench 350% 289GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.2.F.66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1699 1974 2020 2137 1146 1016 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	280% Outstanding	Read 1,718 Write 2,207 Mixed 1,834 SusWrite 1,665 420% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 58.5 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 72.6 238% 79.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,076 DQ Write 492 DQ Mixed 660 522% 743 MB/s
Poor: 218% ↑ This bench: 280% Great: 443%
HP EX900 Plus 1TB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 823GB free Firmware: SN10278 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1752 1878 1861 1895 1149 734 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,509 Write 2,106 Mixed 1,775 SusWrite 1,545 393% 1,734 MB/s	4K Read 52.2 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 68.1 221% 74.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,084 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 681 542% 772 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 366%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/8G 4x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (100^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 24.8 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 26.9 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	58	100	34"	1280 720	XMI3446 Mi Monitor

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	329x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	145x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	80x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	78x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	70x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	48x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x