Notebook N15_17RF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Notebook N15_17RF (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N15_17RF
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20160401
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '23 at 14:09
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 167 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 443 47% 374 Pts	64-Core 441 27% 441 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 0152) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 37 Parallax 6.5 5% 16.5 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 9.1 6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GV256 256GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 134% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0808A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,288 Write 1,313 Mixed 963 265% 1,188 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 11.3 121% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 97 DQ Mixed 273 191% 248 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 184%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 408GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 97 96 96 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 58.4 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 94.6 54% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JAC1600S1108 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.5 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 17.6 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	59	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0A56

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N15_17RF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Notebook N15_17RF

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	23x
Core i5-6440HQIntelBench 66%, 4,172 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GTX 965MNvidiaBench 24%, 3,080 samples	14x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	11x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	4x
SM2280S3G2120G 120GBKingstonBench 74%, 4,240 samples	2x
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples	2x

RAM
JAC1600S1108 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GBUnknownBench 53%, 4 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 215 samples	3x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16