Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Letni Default string (all builds)
Motherboard	NYM J156B
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '23 at 08:00
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4500 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 28% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 50.6 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 112 45% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 118 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	2.5% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.9 2% 3 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.5% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac G535N-KS 256G 256GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 5.8 25 92 16 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.5% Poor	Read 312 Write 194 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 31.2 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 0.5 13% 6.03 MB/s	DQ Read 93 DQ Write 25.7 DQ Mixed 0.4 16% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.7% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.4 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	26	6	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE0B59

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	1x
Celeron N4500IntelBench 28%, 1,026 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	2x

SSD
G535N-KS 256G 256GBNetacBench 38%, 4 samples	1x
SSD 512GBSccts-603-512gBench 68%, 12 samples	1x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GBSamsungBench 49%, 25 samples	1x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GBSamsungBench 33%, 7 samples	1x