Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 22.2
1-Core 20.4
2-Core 45.2
17% 29.3 Pts
4-Core 99.8
8-Core 114
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ant Esports 690 NEO SATA 256GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 126 73 76 70 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
Read 58.3
Write 66.2
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 90.9
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 2.9
652% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
44GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 58 57 60 54 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 52.1
Write 48.4
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 55.4
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED3081BAB3H3HA1 0949 V01D3LF4GB26826813 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 305
13% 305 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 4 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback