MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 07:49
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 170
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 238
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7C89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 0.2
2% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 175 139 223 164 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 356
Write 214
Mixed 276
SusWrite 159
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 30.6
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 204
173% 251 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5190MR86H9F-3200 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 30 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0757 EK220Q A
Typical H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H410M PRO-VH (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback