Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500QC
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateAug 23 '23 at 10:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 95.1
39% 62.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 238
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 11D3) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 60
Parallax 35.7
8% 35.1 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 37.1
24% 27.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 856 811 796 842 826 781 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1387
Write 1,317
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 819
259% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 78.7
239% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 649
416% 477 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 198%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 44 144 15.5" 1536 864 CMN1521
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500QC_M6500QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback