Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506II
Memory	19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '23 at 19:37
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H 27,218 User benchmarks, average bench 70% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Memory 72.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 266 84% 157 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 772 80% 646 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 61 Parallax 19.4 12% 31.7 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 16 Splatting 16.8 12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 17%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 970 Write 921 Mixed 863 205% 918 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 95.2 4K Mixed 50.3 159% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 759 DQ Mixed 400 342% 485 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 185%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 466GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 447 Write 446 Mixed 402 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 48.9 164% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 202 169% 245 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFD832A.M16FJ Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 24GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

CPU
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	223x
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	220x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	274x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	169x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	84x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	77x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	65x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	62x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16