Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 25 '23 at 00:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 308
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 898
92% 746 Pts
64-Core 955
59% 955 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 10 32 6.9 6 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 504
Write 337
Mixed 378
SusWrite 45.5
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 25.9
131% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 0.6
53% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 166%
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
81GB free
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1200 525 163 190 192 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,226
Mixed 1,240
SusWrite 410
247% 1,108 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 70.2
244% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 840
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 813
657% 916 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 206%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 35.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 31
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 144 0" 1920 1080
Typical GA-A520M DS3H Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback