Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 00:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 37.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 212
65% 125 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 479
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 16.5
12% 18 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 23.4
Splatting 18.6
16% 20 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 630
Write 278
Mixed 102
73% 337 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 7.9
25% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 329
220% 264 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC4U1-B8BS Smart SDQAAG6W16XCWE9N1T 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 8.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 7.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 216
18% 216 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 0G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 10% 72 49 1 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO369F
Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback