MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 26 '23 at 14:49
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 169
2-Core 332
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 639
8-Core 1085
105% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,489
92% 1,489 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB; INNO3D N306T2-08D6-119032DH
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 172
Parallax 162
148% 172 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 133
Splatting 116
115% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
455GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 134 7.9 71 143 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 325
Write 173
Mixed 392
SusWrite 130
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 20.3
112% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 28.4
71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 100%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
96GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 83 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 337
Write 396
Mixed 254
SusWrite 89
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 20.4
107% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 34.8
84% 171 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 78%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
20GB free
Firmware: 401120RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 429
Mixed 318
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 45.4
137% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 191
186% 296 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 118%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
55GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 26 28 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 30
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 28.8
21% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
73GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 45 46 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 59.6
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 46.5
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 27" 1280 720 HKC2712 27E1Q
Typical B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 5,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR MAX (MS-7B89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback