Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion x2 Detachable PC 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion x2 Detachable PC 10  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8011
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140909
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '16 at 04:32
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3745D
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 15.8
2-Core 34.6
22% 31.3 Pts
4-Core 66.6
8-Core 56.7
8% 61.7 Pts
64-Core 68.4
4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
HP(103C 8011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3643
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MCG8GC 63GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.3
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 154
Write 32.1
Mixed 67.3
18% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 4.57
4K Mixed 3.65
30% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 23%
Generic 00000 SD Card 64GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 13.9
Mixed 22
15% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.48
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 2.46
540% 3.34 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 26%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 122
Write 39.4
Mixed 59.7
80% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.73
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 1.49
151% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HYNIX 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.8
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback