Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602VV_K6602VV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602VV_K6602VV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6602VV
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 20:59
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 192
2-Core 367
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1014
98% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 303D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 128
Parallax 94.7
108% 118 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 80
Splatting 78.3
78% 99 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 873
Write 719
Mixed 614
163% 735 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 40.8
248% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 608
484% 666 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 49.4
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 28.1
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 16" 1536 960 BOE0B2B
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602VV_K6602VV Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602VV_K6602VV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback