Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer P6679 MD60748

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMedion Erazer P6679 MD60748  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D15KHN
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161030
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateAug 27 '23 at 21:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 75
2-Core 134
52% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 198
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 9.63 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
775GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 23 28 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Read 10
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 23.2
14% 19.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1536 793 LGD0533
Typical Erazer P6679 MD60748 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60748

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback