Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 134
54% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 547
45% 392 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
45.1% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 57
Parallax 76.5
46% 63.5 fps
MRender 54.3
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 42.8
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Puskill 512GB 512GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 284 132 26 24 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 384
Write 305
Mixed 288
SusWrite 123
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 11
64% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 16.1
59% 128 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 29.8
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 25.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 15 165 27" 1280 720 MRG2409 MGMG2410
Typical GA-A520M DS3H Builds (Compare 1,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback