MSI MS-B0A41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star PRO H610 DP21 (MS-B0A4)
MotherboardMSI MS-B0A41  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 05:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 337
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 742
80% 634 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
MSI(1462 B0A4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 8.2
6% 9.43 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 0.4
5% 6.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-wave(p) 256G 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10178
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 1075 752 240 247 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1574
Write 1161
Mixed 897
SusWrite 606
236% 1,060 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 81
309% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 696
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 642
543% 779 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 232%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HSB-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical MS-B0A41 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-B0A41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback