Micro F7BSC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 247%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics231% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive341% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro F7BSC  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BSC
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 17:04
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 200
2-Core 396
115% 223 Pts
4-Core 785
8-Core 1,236
124% 1,010 Pts
64-Core 1,669
103% 1,669 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
Nvidia(10DE 17AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
231% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 324
Parallax 375
270% 344 fps
MRender 453
Gravity 292
Splatting 210
248% 318 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 231%
Great: 256%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 1TB
836GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3540 3573 2603 694 690 696 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
341% Outstanding
Read 1778
Write 3,164
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 1966
487% 2,147 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 79.8
276% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,717
DQ Write 1187
DQ Mixed 1,549
1,130% 1,484 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 341%
Great: 415%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD56S46BD8HA-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
167% Outstanding
MC Read 55.1
MC Write 68.9
MC Mixed 56.4
172% 60.1 GB/s
SC Read 47.5
SC Write 71.1
SC Mixed 58.1
168% 58.9 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 34" 2752 1152 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
Typical F7BSC Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Micro F7BSC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback