Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 13:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$40
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 109
50% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 151
19% 146 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
PwrHis(1787 A460) 2GB
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 31.7
0% 20.2 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 20
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI120G18AI238 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H181007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 22 11 17 17 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 368
Write 25.5
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 14.6
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 10.4
60% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
466GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 158 168 169 178 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 109
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 173
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 22 60 21.5" 1280 720 AIO2105 AIO
Typical GA-H55M-S2 Builds (Compare 289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback