HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cf2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8659
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '23 at 11:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 154
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 296
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8659) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1218
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 4.5
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 6
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 193 273 50 52 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 393
Write 323
Mixed 310
SusWrite 140
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 32.2
109% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 122
97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 0898 KD44GS481-26N1900 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14FF
Typical Laptop 14-cf2xxx Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cf2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback