Positivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-TGLBAT55
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '23 at 02:59
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 243
80% 149 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 450
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 20.9
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 15.6
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C970 M.2 2280 NVMe 512GB SSD
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DHT1E8P2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 942 520 704 711 682 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
163% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 1,178
Mixed 1,185
SusWrite 720
254% 1,136 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 39.1
174% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.5
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 159
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 163%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 15.5" 1536 841 BOE0812
Typical VJFE55F11X-B0211H Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback