Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4020Y 1,246 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 26.6 1-Core 34.8 2-Core 58.3 23% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 95.5 8-Core 66.2 12% 80.8 Pts	64-Core 98.5 6% 98.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz) 3,426 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 215B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 4.2 2% 2.7 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT41H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 101 106 119 127 130 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 375 Write 124 Mixed 127 SusWrite 117 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 15.1 58% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 51.4 66% 119 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G3S160BM.M16FDD 1x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 275 14% 275 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	25	60	13.2"	1366 768	LGD040B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 3,426 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	11x
C400 RealSSD mSATA 128GBMicron $159Bench 50%, 644 samples	5x
LMT-64M6M-HP 64GBLiteonitBench 54%, 49 samples	3x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-RD 2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 88 samples	6x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	4x
HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 3,830 samples	2x