Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_JCNRCV01E86350F

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_JCNRCV01E86350F (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GE
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210208
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '23 at 12:44
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 97.5 2-Core 190 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 475 51% 404 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A4E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.51% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 37.7 Parallax 2.9 2% 14.4 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.51% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB 18,615 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 40 48 57 71 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 495 Write 256 Mixed 278 SusWrite 91 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 15.8 67% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 398 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 291 224% 309 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 126%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 340GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 48 51 55 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 52 Write 63.9 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 52 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 70%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 16GB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 557e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.6 5.1 4.7 5.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 100 Write 9.5 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 4.9 26% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Mixed 0 120% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CB8GS2666.C8RT 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 12.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	60	15.5"	1920 1080	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GE_JCNRCV01E86350F Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GE_JCNRCV01E86350F

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CB8GS2666.C8RT 16GBSamsungBench 68%, 25 samples	1x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16