HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateSep 07 '23 at 07:51
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 43.1
1-Core 56.2
2-Core 107
39% 68.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 336
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 7.3
6% 6.83 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 50 47 6.7 102 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 102
Write 67.2
Mixed 93
SusWrite 49.9
18% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 5.2
24% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 34.5
47% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1B1 Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 27 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0743 KA242Y
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 3,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback