Intel NUC12SNKi72

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC12SNKi72
MotherboardIntel NUC12SNKi72  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 00:24
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 179
2-Core 358
105% 203 Pts
4-Core 664
8-Core 1,206
112% 935 Pts
64-Core 1,869
116% 1,869 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A770M Graphics
Intel(8086 3026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4669
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 137
Parallax 178
74% 135 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 150
Splatting 187
148% 181 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 103%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1872 1964 1889 1843 1870 1914 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,036
Write 1,902
Mixed 1,839
SusWrite 1,892
432% 1,917 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 68.8
217% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 746
528% 688 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 294%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 3200 C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 36
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 25.2
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 170 3 144 34" 3440 1440 DELD12C DELL S3422DWG
Typical NUC12SNKi72 Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Intel NUC12SNKi72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback