Today's hottest deals

Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock A620M-HDV/M.2+  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock A620M-HDV/M.2+
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 12:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$182
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 237
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 284
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 35.2
28% 35.4 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 35
Splatting 24.9
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
633GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 236 267 266 260 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 770
Write 287
Mixed 382
SusWrite 260
94% 425 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 50.2
223% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 368
281% 395 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 132%
Great: 348%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
21GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 36 27 19 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 214
Write 25.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 26.8
68% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.6
151% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD516G480081 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
71.2% Very good
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 28.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 29.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 30 84.6" 1296 759 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical A620M-HDV/M.2+ Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asrock A620M-HDV/M.2+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback