Biostar T77

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar T77 (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120405
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '23 at 14:01
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 88 2-Core 174 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 226 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.9% Average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 56.5 Parallax 80.6 52% 66.9 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 61 Splatting 43.3 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03170007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 53 70 47 71 45 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 47.6 Write 172 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 59.6 20% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 28.8 55% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 35.3 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 43.3 36% 50 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 386GB free Firmware: 03200001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 246 245 286 102 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 322 Write 272 Mixed 221 SusWrite 194 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 26.7 78% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 69.7 DQ Mixed 42.3 35% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 96GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 54 72 46 72 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 110 Write 114 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 60.2 64% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 84GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 51 49 49 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 81 Write 75.5 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 49.5 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8313 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Hynix R538G1601U2S-UGO 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.4 26% 9.27 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	18	60	21.5"	1280 720	PHLC0AB 227E4L

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical T77 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar T77

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	6x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	4x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	3x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	5x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
CL7-7-7 DDR3-1333 2x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 29 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1x4GBCrucialBench 28%, 1,892 samples	2x
CL11-11-11 D3-1600 8313 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Hynix R538G1601U2S-UGO 16GBUnknownBench 31%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $77

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16