Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 161
48% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 226
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
MSI(1462 3985) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 115
Parallax 279
115% 178 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 146
Splatting 189
157% 194 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$20
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 286
Write 233
Mixed 244
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 22.1
65% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 178
153% 223 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Husky 512GB 512GB
37GB free
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 12 12 12 10 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 348
Write 285
Mixed 269
SusWrite 48.1
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 11.6
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.3
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 31.2
65% 127 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
37GB free
Firmware: SM30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8.5
Write 12
Mixed 19
10% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.1
Write 5
Mixed 7.7
14% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.4
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 40 24 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2851 Beyond TV
Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback