Today's hottest deals

HP 550-127c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-127c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B35
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '23 at 23:00
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 30.7
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 84.3
31% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 171
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2B35) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 11.9
6% 8.93 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 7.1
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SD Ultra 3D 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 530309WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 209 247 254 236 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 347
Write 274
Mixed 303
SusWrite 250
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 28.7
97% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 69.2
74% 127 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 21% 24 80 41 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical 550-127c Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-127c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback