TIMI Mi NoteBook Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTIMI Mi NoteBook Ultra  (all builds)
MotherboardTIMI TM2127
Memory3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220715
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 03:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-11320H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 43.6
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 162
53% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 348
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1D72 2127) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1003
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 22.2
15% 19.5 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 16.7
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEXA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 481 437 351 281 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 574
Write 578
Mixed 579
SusWrite 377
119% 527 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 24.7
95% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 564
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 370
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 8.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 90 15.6" 1600 1000 TMX1560 TL156MDMP01-1
Typical Mi NoteBook Ultra Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: TIMI Mi NoteBook Ultra

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback