MSI H110M PRO-V (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-V (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '23 at 13:51
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 198
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 326
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX590 GME
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1440 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.7% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 90.2
54% 73.4 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 49.2
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2818E
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 463
Write 411
Mixed 377
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 11.5
99% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 19.7
66% 140 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MG4U3200CL23-16GB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACI24C7 ASUS VP247
Typical H110M PRO-V (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-V (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback