Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '23 at 08:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 696
76% 604 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 128GB 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 419 421 271 120 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 430
Mixed 407
SusWrite 298
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 29.4
156% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 44.1
84% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4081CAA2F1NA4 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 17.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 24 36.1" 1280 720 AML0030 AML TV
Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback