Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 10:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 99
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 522
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.7% Poor
Lighting 34.1
Reflection 46.5
Parallax 33.3
28% 38 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 26.9
27% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 34 27 19 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 182 179 184 183 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 180
Mixed 120
SusWrite 182
124% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
249% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD Patriot PSD44G240081 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.2% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback