HP Laptop 14-em0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-em0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B27
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 04:17
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 57.4
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 165
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 223
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B27) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21031.1005
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 11.5
5% 9.7 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 18.7
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG450E500G-G 500GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMB0.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 781 777 733 773 768 780 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 825
Mixed 807
SusWrite 769
186% 824 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 37.1
121% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 335
240% 316 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 134%
Great: 406%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 27.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 20.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUOCE90
Typical Laptop 14-em0xxx Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-em0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback