Today's hottest deals

Alaska A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAlaska A_M_I_  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 09:13
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10810U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 40.1
26% 38 Pts
4-Core 63.4
8-Core 65.2
9% 64.3 Pts
64-Core 73.7
5% 73.7 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.77 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CYX-SSD-S1000 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09787
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 249 247 244 246 259 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 278
Write 240
Mixed 269
SusWrite 248
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 6.7
27% 8.13 MB/s
DQ Read 74.9
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 77.8
58% 77 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NS08GS4E8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACR03DC Acer K272HL
Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Alaska A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback