PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel H61 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20220408 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 20 '23 at 18:29 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
66.1%
Good
|
62% 103 Pts
|
40% 323 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56%
Above average
|
59% 81.2 fps
|
51% 62.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston A400 240GB-$28
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 55 95 32 129 22 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
22% 98.8 MB/s
|
72% 25.2 MB/s
|
68% 137 MB/s
|
![]() Consistent NVME S6 512GB
320GB free
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 517 669 754 716 800 MB/s
|
138%
Outstanding
|
188% 839 MB/s
|
121% 39.3 MB/s
|
303% 405 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 138 161 163 161 163 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
99% 136 MB/s
|
126% 0.97 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 68 67 68 68 MB/s
|
50.7%
Above average
|
65% 87.8 MB/s
|
174% 1.17 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() EVM DDR3 8GB1600 Samsung 8G1600L 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
52.9%
Above average
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
44% 15.2 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 62 | 41 | 100 | 21.4" | 1280 720 | ACR0B96 EK220Q H3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,009x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,025x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 998x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,036x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,354x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 723x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |