Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MW50-SV0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MW50-SV0  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 19:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$116
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 589
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 72
51% 69.3 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 57.3
51% 63.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 221 185 238 227 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 394
Write 203
Mixed 162
SusWrite 213
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 18.5
80% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 83.3
119% 225 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-008.D01G 9965589-008.D01G 9965589-008.D01G Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 35.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1920 1017 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical GA-MW50-SV0 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MW50-SV0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback