Biostar J4105NHU

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar J4105NHU (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 13:56
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	69%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 36.6 1-Core 52.6 2-Core 99.9 35% 63 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 123 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.1% Poor	Lighting 33.7 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 35.7 28% 35.8 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 26.1 26% 33.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 120GB 2,648 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 172 77 57 71 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 372 Write 33.7 Mixed 118 SusWrite 97.4 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 5.9 33% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.M16FB CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 3.5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	49	16	0	40.1"	1280 720	SAM0B60 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J4105NHU Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar J4105NHU

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	15x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	12x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	3x
SSD 240GBIntensoBench 74%, 1,366 samples	2x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	2x
CT4G4DFS8266.M8FF CT4G4DFS8266.C8FG 8GBCrucialBench 47%, 3 samples	2x
DDR4 3000 1x8GBAdataBench 46%, 15,335 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363