Today's hottest deals

Mini Overclock 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMini Overclock 3  (all builds)
MotherboardMini Rev JSL5 DDR4 1.10
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 03:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 46.8
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 110
41% 71.8 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 166
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 800F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget 256GB 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 741 734 782 744 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 855
Write 692
Mixed 668
SusWrite 697
164% 728 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 22.7
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 406
278% 343 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 118%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D22.2730CS.003 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 27 60 28.4" 1920 1009 ASM1560 ASM-156FC
Typical Overclock 3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Mini Overclock 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback